THREATS
You've been serve-veilled. Newly declassified files show that a federal judge last year ruled the FBI's searches of a database of intercepted email messages to be in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the one protecting Americans against warrantless searches and seizures. The once-hidden legal spat, elucidated by the New York Times , concerns Section 702 of the FISA Amendments Act, a policy that enabled warrantless surveillance in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
Start spreading the (fake) news. An 85-page report released Tuesday by the Senate Intelligence Committee criticizes tech giants for spreading misinformation during the 2016 presidential election and urges them to do better during next year's contest. While past reports focused mainly on Facebook and Twitter, the new one takes other firms to task, including Google's YouTube, Reddit, Microsoft's LinkedIn, and Pinterest.
As one Russian operative reportedly put it after Trump won, "We uncorked a bottle of champagne...[and] we uttered almost in unison: 'We made America great.'"
GDP-Bragh. Ireland's Data Protection Commission has finished investigating Facebook's WhatsApp and Twitter for potential breaches of EU data privacy laws, respectively involving their data-sharing disclosures and breach notifications. The process has moved into the decision-making phase, spokespeople said, and possible fine recommendations are likely to come by end of year.
Walking on eggshells. Chinese censorship has been creeping across the border. Senator Marco Rubio has asked the government to investigate social media phenom TikTok over censorship claims. Apple has reportedly asked show producers not to get on the Communist Party's bad side. The New York Times ' Farhad Manjoo writes that "dealing with China isn't worth the moral cost ." (Of course, the Times is already banned there.)
Check and mate.
Share today's Cyber Saturday with a friend: http://fortune.com/newsletter/cybersaturday/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=cyber-saturday&utm_content=2019101222pm
Looking for previous Data Sheets? Click here.
ACCESS GRANTED
Ash Carter, a former U.S. Secretary of Defense and current director of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at the Harvard Kennedy School, says we need to cheer on technology projects designed with public ethics in mind. So his school is debuting, in conjunction with Wired, a "tech spotlight" to "recognize products, initiatives, and policies that embrace principles such as privacy, security, safety, transparency, accountability, and inclusion—and that aim to minimize technological harms." Here he describes the initiative's rationale.
Technology and all of objective science are caught in a crisis of reputation. From investigations into competition practices to legislative scrutiny over the application and safety of new products, innovators are facing a reckoning for their seeming absence of principles such as privacy, security, inclusion, transparency, and accountability. But it is possible to bend the arc of innovation toward overall public purpose.
FORTUNE RECON
The Power Grid Is Evolving. Cybersecurity Must Too by Neil Chatterjee
Why Did Google Offer Black People $5 to Harvest Their Faces? by Jeremy Kahn
Privacy, Civil Rights Groups Press Amazon's Ring to End Its Local Police Partnerships by Lisa Marie Segarra
What It's Like at the Center of the Surveillance Economy by Adam Lashinsky
'Mr. Robot' Creator Sam Esmail on the Show's Fourth and Final Season by Paula Bernstein
ONE MORE THING
On a completely unrelated note, LitHub, a literary blog, just published the contents of an old talk delivered by Philip Pullman, a favorite author of mine, circa middle school, and creator of His Dark Materials trilogy, which will be released as an HBO TV series next month. (Pullman also has a new novel out .) The subject of the lecture: What separates children's literature from adult literature? Is the former less sophisticated than the latter? Is it, as one critic put it, unserious?
For those who cannot get enough Pullman, The New Yorker recently interviewed him for a Q&A. I like the bit about J.R.R. Tolkien, who, Pullman believes, wrote "very, very, thin stuff."
No comments:
Post a Comment